• Моля поставете тук съобщението за грешка което виждате, ако има такова

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Моля обяснете, какво искахте да направите, какво направихте и какво се случи

• Какъв е вашия браузър?

• Моля копирайте/поставете текстът показан на аглийски, вместо на Вашия език. Ако имате скрийншот с този бъг (това е добър навик), можете да го качите на избран от вас хостинг за изображения (например snipboard.io) и да копирате линка от там тук. Наличен ли е този текст в системата за превод? Ако да, бил ли е преведен за повече от 24 часа?

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Какъв е вашия браузър?

• Моля обяснете вашето придложение ясно и кратко така че да бъде възможно най-разбираемо.

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Какъв е вашия браузър?

• Какво е било показано на екрана, когато сте били блокирани (празен екран? Част от интерфейса на играта? Съобщение за грешка?)

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Какъв е вашия браузър?

• Коя част от правилата не е била спазена от BGA адаптацията

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Нарушенията на правилата видими ли са при повторение на играта? Ако да, на кой ход се случват?

• Какъв е вашия браузър?

• Какъв бе игровият ход, който се опитахте да извършите?

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Какво се опитвате да направите, за да задействате тази игра?

• Какво се случи, когато се опитахте да направите това (съобщение за грешка, съобщение за статуса на играта, ...)?

• Какъв е вашия браузър?

• В кой момент от играта се появи проблема (каква е била съответната инструкция в играта)?

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Какво се случи, когато се опитахте да извършите действието в играта (съобщение за грешка, съобщение за статуса на играта, ...)?

• Какъв е вашия браузър?

• Моля опишете грешката при изобразяването Ако имате скрийншот с този бъг (това е добър навик), можете да го качите на избран от вас хостинг за изображения (например snipboard.io) и да копирате линка от там тук.

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Какъв е вашия браузър?

• Моля копирайте/поставете текстът показан на аглийски, вместо на Вашия език. Ако имате скрийншот с този бъг (това е добър навик), можете да го качите на избран от вас хостинг за изображения (например snipboard.io) и да копирате линка от там тук. Наличен ли е този текст в системата за превод? Ако да, бил ли е преведен за повече от 24 часа?

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Какъв е вашия браузър?

• Моля обяснете вашето придложение ясно и кратко така че да бъде възможно най-разбираемо.

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Какъв е вашия браузър?