• Моля поставете тук съобщението за грешка което виждате, ако има такова

This was a three-way game with players at 165, 191 and 134 ELO. The 134 ELO player lost the game, the other two tied. The calculation of the win for 191 over 134 was 18.86 for both players and that was correctly applied to both players. The calculation of the win for 165 over 134 was calculated correctly as 20.5 for the 134 player. But it was calculated incorrectly as 6.83 for the 165 player. So the 165 player received 14 fewer ELO points than he should have. (See screenshots.) This may be because the 134 player got his ELO change clipped, although the numbers do not match up.

• Моля обяснете, какво искахте да направите, какво направихте и какво се случи

At the end of the game during the ELO calculations.

• Какъв е вашия браузър?

• Моля копирайте/поставете текстът показан на аглийски, вместо на Вашия език. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Наличен ли е този текст в системата за превод? Ако да, бил ли е преведен за повече от 24 часа?

This was a three-way game with players at 165, 191 and 134 ELO. The 134 ELO player lost the game, the other two tied. The calculation of the win for 191 over 134 was 18.86 for both players and that was correctly applied to both players. The calculation of the win for 165 over 134 was calculated correctly as 20.5 for the 134 player. But it was calculated incorrectly as 6.83 for the 165 player. So the 165 player received 14 fewer ELO points than he should have. (See screenshots.) This may be because the 134 player got his ELO change clipped, although the numbers do not match up.

• Какъв е вашия браузър?

• Моля обяснете вашето придложение ясно и кратко така че да бъде възможно най-разбираемо.

This was a three-way game with players at 165, 191 and 134 ELO. The 134 ELO player lost the game, the other two tied. The calculation of the win for 191 over 134 was 18.86 for both players and that was correctly applied to both players. The calculation of the win for 165 over 134 was calculated correctly as 20.5 for the 134 player. But it was calculated incorrectly as 6.83 for the 165 player. So the 165 player received 14 fewer ELO points than he should have. (See screenshots.) This may be because the 134 player got his ELO change clipped, although the numbers do not match up.

• Какъв е вашия браузър?

• Какво е било показано на екрана, когато сте били блокирани (празен екран? Част от интерфейса на играта? Съобщение за грешка?)

This was a three-way game with players at 165, 191 and 134 ELO. The 134 ELO player lost the game, the other two tied. The calculation of the win for 191 over 134 was 18.86 for both players and that was correctly applied to both players. The calculation of the win for 165 over 134 was calculated correctly as 20.5 for the 134 player. But it was calculated incorrectly as 6.83 for the 165 player. So the 165 player received 14 fewer ELO points than he should have. (See screenshots.) This may be because the 134 player got his ELO change clipped, although the numbers do not match up.

• Какъв е вашия браузър?

• Коя част от правилата не е била спазена от BGA адаптацията

This was a three-way game with players at 165, 191 and 134 ELO. The 134 ELO player lost the game, the other two tied. The calculation of the win for 191 over 134 was 18.86 for both players and that was correctly applied to both players. The calculation of the win for 165 over 134 was calculated correctly as 20.5 for the 134 player. But it was calculated incorrectly as 6.83 for the 165 player. So the 165 player received 14 fewer ELO points than he should have. (See screenshots.) This may be because the 134 player got his ELO change clipped, although the numbers do not match up.

• Нарушенията на правилата видими ли са при повторение на играта? Ако да, на кой ход се случват?

At the end of the game during the ELO calculations.

• Какъв е вашия браузър?

• Какъв бе игровият ход, който се опитахте да извършите?

This was a three-way game with players at 165, 191 and 134 ELO. The 134 ELO player lost the game, the other two tied. The calculation of the win for 191 over 134 was 18.86 for both players and that was correctly applied to both players. The calculation of the win for 165 over 134 was calculated correctly as 20.5 for the 134 player. But it was calculated incorrectly as 6.83 for the 165 player. So the 165 player received 14 fewer ELO points than he should have. (See screenshots.) This may be because the 134 player got his ELO change clipped, although the numbers do not match up.

• Какво се опитвате да направите, за да задействате тази игра?

At the end of the game during the ELO calculations.

• Какво се случи, когато се опитахте да направите това (съобщение за грешка, съобщение за статуса на играта, ...)?

• Какъв е вашия браузър?

• В кой момент от играта се появи проблема (каква е била съответната инструкция в играта)?

This was a three-way game with players at 165, 191 and 134 ELO. The 134 ELO player lost the game, the other two tied. The calculation of the win for 191 over 134 was 18.86 for both players and that was correctly applied to both players. The calculation of the win for 165 over 134 was calculated correctly as 20.5 for the 134 player. But it was calculated incorrectly as 6.83 for the 165 player. So the 165 player received 14 fewer ELO points than he should have. (See screenshots.) This may be because the 134 player got his ELO change clipped, although the numbers do not match up.

• Какво се случи, когато се опитахте да извършите действието в играта (съобщение за грешка, съобщение за статуса на играта, ...)?

At the end of the game during the ELO calculations.

• Какъв е вашия браузър?

• Моля опишете грешката при изобразяването If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

This was a three-way game with players at 165, 191 and 134 ELO. The 134 ELO player lost the game, the other two tied. The calculation of the win for 191 over 134 was 18.86 for both players and that was correctly applied to both players. The calculation of the win for 165 over 134 was calculated correctly as 20.5 for the 134 player. But it was calculated incorrectly as 6.83 for the 165 player. So the 165 player received 14 fewer ELO points than he should have. (See screenshots.) This may be because the 134 player got his ELO change clipped, although the numbers do not match up.

• Какъв е вашия браузър?

• Моля копирайте/поставете текстът показан на аглийски, вместо на Вашия език. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Наличен ли е този текст в системата за превод? Ако да, бил ли е преведен за повече от 24 часа?

This was a three-way game with players at 165, 191 and 134 ELO. The 134 ELO player lost the game, the other two tied. The calculation of the win for 191 over 134 was 18.86 for both players and that was correctly applied to both players. The calculation of the win for 165 over 134 was calculated correctly as 20.5 for the 134 player. But it was calculated incorrectly as 6.83 for the 165 player. So the 165 player received 14 fewer ELO points than he should have. (See screenshots.) This may be because the 134 player got his ELO change clipped, although the numbers do not match up.

• Какъв е вашия браузър?

• Моля обяснете вашето придложение ясно и кратко така че да бъде възможно най-разбираемо.

This was a three-way game with players at 165, 191 and 134 ELO. The 134 ELO player lost the game, the other two tied. The calculation of the win for 191 over 134 was 18.86 for both players and that was correctly applied to both players. The calculation of the win for 165 over 134 was calculated correctly as 20.5 for the 134 player. But it was calculated incorrectly as 6.83 for the 165 player. So the 165 player received 14 fewer ELO points than he should have. (See screenshots.) This may be because the 134 player got his ELO change clipped, although the numbers do not match up.

• Какъв е вашия браузър?